Air wall,
Open air connection between zones[LINK]
It is extremely difficult to model the interactions between
thermal zones which are connected by a large opening. If the
zones are controlled to the same conditions, then there is
little to be gained by making them interact, so you could
neglect any connections between the zones. In fact, if this is
the case, you might consider combining the spaces into a
single thermal zone. If you expect the zones to have
significantly different temperatures and/or humidities, then
use one of the following options. If they are modeled as
separate zones, EnergyPlus models only what is explicitly
described in the input file, so simply leaving a void (no
surfaces) between two zones will accomplish nothing - the two
zones will not be connected. The main interactions which occur
across the dividing line between two zones which are fully
open to each other are:
- Convection or airflow, which will transfer both sensible
heat and moisture. Some modelers use MIXING (one-way flow) or
CROSS MIXING (two-way flow) to move air between the zones, but
the user must specify airflow rates and schedules for this
flow, and it cannot be automatically linked to HVAC system
operation. Other modelers use AirFlowNetwork with large
vertical openings between the zones as well as other openings
and cracks in the exterior envelope to provide the driving
forces. It can also be connected with the HVAC system (for
limited system types). This requires a much higher level of
detailed input and should be used only if the detailed
specification data is available. If the two zones are
controlled to similar conditions, this effect could be safely
neglected.
- Solar gains and daylighting. The only way to pass solar
and daylight from one zone to the next is through a window or
glass door described as a subsurface on an interzone wall
surface. Note that all solar is diffuse after passing through
an interior window.
- Radiant (long-wave thermal) transfer. There is currently
no direct radiant exchange between surfaces in different
thermal zones. Windows in EnergyPlus are opaque to direct
radiant exchange, so an interzone window will not behave any
differently than an opaque interzone surface for this aspect.
However, a large interzone surface (opaque or window) would
result in some indirect radiant exchange since the interzone
surface will exchange directly with surfaces in zone A and in
zone B. The surface thermal resistance should be low in order
to most closely approximate this effect.
- Conduction. If an interzone surface is placed between the
two zones, it will conduct sensible heat between the two
zones. Using a low thermal resistance helps to move radiant
exchange between the zones.
- Visible and thermal radiant output from internal gains.
These gains will not cross zone boundaries. But again, they
will impact any interzone surfaces, so some of the energy may
move across to the next zone.”
Air wall, Open air connection between zones[LINK]
It is extremely difficult to model the interactions between thermal zones which are connected by a large opening. If the zones are controlled to the same conditions, then there is little to be gained by making them interact, so you could neglect any connections between the zones. In fact, if this is the case, you might consider combining the spaces into a single thermal zone. If you expect the zones to have significantly different temperatures and/or humidities, then use one of the following options. If they are modeled as separate zones, EnergyPlus models only what is explicitly described in the input file, so simply leaving a void (no surfaces) between two zones will accomplish nothing - the two zones will not be connected. The main interactions which occur across the dividing line between two zones which are fully open to each other are:
Documentation content copyright © 1996-2026 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois and the Regents of the University of California through the Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. All rights reserved. EnergyPlus is a trademark of the US Department of Energy.
This documentation is made available under the EnergyPlus Open Source License v1.0.